研究迴圈報告 — Run #11

研究主題:credit spreads · 產生時間:2026-03-11 10:01:43 UTC

總輪次
5
總假說數
48
已確認
0
已拒絕
0
待驗證
48
最高信心
0.9500

執行摘要

本次研究迴圈共進行 5 輪, 產生 48 個假說, 其中 0 個通過驗證、 0 個被拒絕、 48 個待驗證。

總耗時 0 秒, 消耗 0 tokens。

各輪摘要

輪次Agent 數Agents假說數耗時Tokens
R13optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 19
R23optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 11
R33optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 5
R42devil, risk-auditor 8
R52portfolio-mgr, risk-auditor 5

假說清單

Round 1 (19 假說)

狀態維度信心假說
pending credit spreads 0.6500 SPX weekly put credit spreads (3% OTM, $10 wide, 1-5 DTE) generate consistent positive returns with >90% win rate
pending credit spreads 0.5500 Monday-only entries improve risk-adjusted returns for credit spreads
pending credit spreads 0.6000 Wider spreads ($25) capture more premium and improve gross returns
pending credit spreads 0.5000 Further OTM (5%) improves win rate but may not improve risk-adjusted returns
pending credit spreads 0.9500 Extreme data sparsity: ~96% of rows have zero/null prices, only 2-4% of minute bars contain tradeable data. Backtests must filter close > 0 AND volume > 0 strictly, or will produce phantom fills on stale/zero quotes.
pending credit spreads 0.8800 Paired leg availability is adequate on expiration day (~87%) but sparse on earlier days. Credit spread backtests may suffer from look-ahead bias if both legs are not required to have simultaneous non-zero prices.
pending credit spreads 0.9200 Overnight gap risk is severe and cannot be hedged intraday. Overnight jumps of 10-25 points observed regularly on a single put strike, which can flip a credit spread from profitable to max loss.
pending credit spreads 0.8500 Bid-ask spreads are significant for deep OTM options, creating a fill-quality problem. Using close/mid prices for backtesting overestimates actual returns.
pending credit spreads 0.9500 March 2020 crash data shows extreme tail risk for put credit spreads. SPX dropped ~34% peak-to-trough. OTM puts with strikes at 2400-2500 had avg close of $40-50 during the crash — these would normally be near-zero.
pending credit spreads 0.8000 Volume on individual minute bars is low (median ~1-5 contracts for OTM puts). This means real-world execution at backtest prices is questionable for any meaningful position size.
pending credit spreads 0.9000 No bid/ask data available — only OHLCV. This is a fundamental limitation for credit spread backtesting where execution quality (short at bid, long at ask) determines profitability.
pending credit spreads 0.7500 Strike spacing is $5 for near-the-money SPX options. Credit spreads with 5-point width collect very small premiums (~$1-3) making them highly sensitive to transaction costs and slippage.
pending credit spreads 0.9200 Sharpe ratio > 3.0 for any credit spread strategy should be treated as a data artifact or overfitting signal. Credit spreads have inherently negative skew (small frequent gains, rare large losses).
pending credit spreads 0.7000 Pin risk near expiration: SPX options are European-style and cash-settled, eliminating assignment risk. But gamma risk near expiration can cause rapid P&L swings that minute-bar data may not capture accurately.
pending credit spreads 0.8200 Short put credit spreads on SPX at 16-delta short strike, 45 DTE, $50 wide, closed at 50% profit or 21 DTE, outperform hold-to-expiration on a risk-adjusted basis (Sharpe > 0.8). The 'tastylive standard' approach with mechanical management rules captures theta decay efficiently while avoiding gamma ...
pending credit spreads 0.7200 0DTE SPX put credit spreads at 5-delta short strike, $5 wide, entered daily at market open, yield annualized returns >15% with win rate >75%, but exhibit fat left-tail risk (worst day loss > 10x average win). Day-of-week effects exist, with Tuesday showing the best risk-adjusted performance.
pending credit spreads 0.6800 VIX-regime-filtered credit spreads (sell only when VIX > 20) produce higher Sharpe ratios than unconditional selling, because elevated implied volatility provides richer premiums that more than compensate for the higher realized volatility. Conversely, selling in VIX < 15 environments underperforms.
pending credit spreads 0.6500 Spread width significantly impacts risk-adjusted returns: $5-wide spreads have higher win rates but lower Sharpe than $25-wide spreads, because wider spreads capture more of the volatility risk premium per unit of margin. The optimal width for SPX put credit spreads at 45 DTE is $25, balancing premi...
pending credit spreads 0.6000 Iron condors (simultaneous put + call credit spreads) at 10-delta on both sides, 45 DTE, $25 wide, managed at 50% profit, outperform one-sided put credit spreads on a risk-adjusted basis because the double premium collection provides a wider break-even range and higher win rate, despite the two-side...

Round 2 (11 假說)

狀態維度信心假說
pending entry_timing 0.4500 Monday Sharpe 1.73 is statistically significant vs baseline but likely overstated due to selection bias
pending entry_timing 0.9200 3% OTM 0DTE put spread credit is near-zero ($0.05 or less), making the strategy economically unviable at this strike distance
pending entry_timing 0.8800 97% zero-close bars make P&L calculations unreliable — VWAP carry-forward creates phantom prices
pending entry_timing 0.8500 High win rates (90%+) mask catastrophic tail risk — 6-7 winning trades required to recover one loss
pending entry_timing 0.7500 Year-by-year stability is questionable — 2022 bear market likely has much lower win rate than 2023-2024
pending entry_timing 0.9000 Slippage impact is severe — $0.05 tick size means 100% slippage on most 3% OTM trades
pending entry_timing 0.7500 Monday credit spreads outperform due to weekend theta compression: market makers suppress Friday decay and VIX statistically rises only on Mondays, creating a volatility premium sellers can harvest. Selling Monday AM captures both weekend-accumulated theta and the Monday VIX mean-reversion.
pending entry_timing 0.6500 Tuesday is the second-best day for credit spreads due to 'Turnaround Tuesday' effect — the S&P 500 shows the highest average daily return on Tuesdays, creating favorable conditions for put credit spread sellers.
pending entry_timing 0.6000 Mid-morning entry (10:30 AM ET) outperforms open entry (9:31 AM) for credit spreads because the opening range establishes price levels and initial volatility spike subsides, allowing better strike selection and tighter spreads.
pending entry_timing 0.7000 1-2 DTE credit spreads provide better risk-adjusted returns than 0DTE because they avoid gamma explosion risk while still capturing accelerated theta decay, and they allow overnight theta collection.
pending entry_timing 0.5500 OPEX week (monthly options expiration, 3rd Friday) creates a distinct regime for credit spreads: pre-OPEX volatility suppression favors sellers, but post-OPEX volatility expansion creates risk. Avoid entering new spreads on OPEX Friday itself.

Round 3 (5 假說)

狀態維度信心假說
pending strike_selection 0.7800 5-7 delta short put strikes (approximately 3-5% OTM) produce the best risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe > 0.7) for SPX put credit spreads at 4-7 DTE, outperforming both tighter strikes (2% OTM / 16-delta, too much gamma risk) and wider strikes (10% OTM / 2-delta, insufficient premium). The 5-7 delta zon...
pending strike_selection 0.7200 $25-wide spreads produce the highest Sharpe ratio for SPX put credit spreads, outperforming both narrow ($5-$10) and very wide ($50) spreads. Narrow spreads have near-binary payoffs (win small / lose everything) while $50 spreads tie up excessive margin. $25 captures the optimal premium-to-risk rati...
pending strike_selection 0.6500 Strike selection and DTE interact significantly: closer strikes (2-3% OTM) need shorter DTE (0-2 days) to avoid directional risk accumulation, while wider strikes (5-7% OTM) perform best at 4-7 DTE where they can capture meaningful theta. The optimal {OTM%, DTE} pair is {5% OTM, 5 DTE}, not {3% OTM,...
pending strike_selection 0.5000 Round-number strikes (multiples of $50 or $100, e.g., 5000, 5050, 5100) accumulate excess open interest creating gamma walls and pinning effects. Put credit spreads with short strikes at round numbers have lower win rates than spreads at non-round strikes because large open interest at round numbers...
pending strike_selection 0.5800 Asymmetric iron condors with wider put wings ($25) and narrower call wings ($10) produce better risk-adjusted returns than symmetric condors, because SPX has a left-skewed return distribution (crashes are larger than rallies). The wider put wing captures more premium on the side where implied volati...

Round 4 (8 假說)

狀態維度信心假說
pending validation 0.9200 METHODOLOGY FATAL FLAW #1: MAX(close) cherry-picking inflates entry credits by ~7-14%, making baseline UNPROFITABLE after transaction costs
pending validation 0.7800 METHODOLOGY FATAL FLAW #2: NaN-to-zero exit asymmetry is smaller than feared (~11% of trades) but still biases results systematically
pending validation 0.8800 MONDAY EFFECT IS DATA MINING: fails Bonferroni correction, unreproducible across rounds, and negative in 2024
pending validation 0.7200 5% OTM SUPERIORITY IS PARTIALLY A DATA ARTIFACT: farther OTM = more NaN->$0 exits = artificially higher win rates
pending validation 0.9000 BEST_COMBO (5% OTM, $25 wide) FAILS OUT-OF-SAMPLE: Sharpe drops from 1.04 to 0.32 in 2020-2021
pending validation 0.8500 TRANSACTION COSTS DESTROY BASELINE AND NARROW VARIANTS: only MON_ONLY and wider-OTM variants survive
pending validation 0.7500 REAL-WORLD FEASIBILITY: even the best surviving variant generates trivial returns relative to effort and risk
pending validation 0.8200 CRITICAL META-BUG: Sharpe calculation uses sqrt(52) annualization but trade frequency is NOT 52/year for most variants

Round 5 (5 假說)

狀態維度信心假說
pending go_no_go 0.9200 SPX weekly put credit spreads are NOT suitable for live deployment in current form
pending position_sizing 0.6500 If forced to trade conditionally, VIX > 25 filter with extreme position limits is the only defensible approach
pending data_quality 0.9500 Bid/ask spread data is the single highest-value improvement to pursue
pending alternative_strategy 0.7200 SPY options with available bid/ask EOD data may be a better research target
pending alternative_strategy 0.5500 Iron condor or jade lizard structures may improve risk-adjusted returns

錯誤日誌摘要

最近錯誤

方法評分

Agent方法成功率提出數確認數樣本數
optimizercredit spreads0.00%404
risk-auditorcredit spreads0.00%10010
researchercredit spreads0.00%505
risk-auditorentry_timing0.00%606
researcherentry_timing0.00%505
researcherstrike_selection0.00%505
devilvalidation0.00%808
portfolio-mgrgo_no_go0.00%101
portfolio-mgrposition_sizing0.00%101
portfolio-mgrdata_quality0.00%101
portfolio-mgralternative_strategy0.00%202

建議與後續行動