研究迴圈報告 — Run #17

研究主題:multi-asset momentum extended validation, momentum statistical significance, regime-adaptive momentum, momentum with volatility overlay · 產生時間:2026-03-11 10:01:44 UTC

總輪次
10
總假說數
21
已確認
0
已拒絕
0
待驗證
21
最高信心
0.9700

執行摘要

本次研究迴圈共進行 10 輪, 產生 21 個假說, 其中 0 個通過驗證、 0 個被拒絕、 21 個待驗證。

總耗時 0 秒, 消耗 0 tokens。

各輪摘要

輪次Agent 數Agents假說數耗時Tokens
R13optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 8
R23optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 7
R34ic_0dte_results, optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 0
R43optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 0
R54backtest_output, optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 0
R63optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 5
R72devil, risk-auditor 1
R82optimizer, risk-auditor 0
R92portfolio-mgr, risk-auditor 0
R102portfolio-mgr, risk-auditor 0

假說清單

Round 1 (8 假說)

狀態維度信心假說
pending statistical-power 0.9500 6-year data window has sufficient statistical power to detect realistic momentum Sharpe ratios
pending multiple-testing 0.9700 At least one momentum variant has statistically significant positive returns after multiple testing correction
pending regime-dependency 0.9300 Momentum strategy performance is consistent across market regimes
pending factor-attribution 0.9200 Momentum strategy generates genuine alpha beyond factor exposures
pending selection-bias 0.9500 The SPY/TLT/GLD asset universe was selected a priori, not because it performed best
pending bootstrap-validation 0.9000 Bootstrap confidence intervals for Sharpe ratio exclude zero
pending gold-bias 0.8800 The GLD-driven momentum edge is robust and not a period-specific artifact
pending parameter-sensitivity 0.9000 Lookback period sensitivity indicates overfitting

Round 2 (7 假說)

狀態維度信心假說
pending statistical-power-by-frequency 0.9700 Different strategy frequencies have dramatically different statistical power with our 6-year dataset
pending testability-ranking 0.9200 Some strategy classes are far more testable than others with our specific dataset
pending overfitting-risk 0.9500 Overfitting risk scales exponentially with parameter count relative to sample size
pending failure-analysis 0.9300 All prior research failures share common root causes that can be systematically avoided
pending research-direction 0.8800 0DTE premium selling is the optimal next research direction given our dataset and prior failures
pending research-direction 0.8500 Daily implied volatility mean reversion provides a complementary research direction with strong testability
pending process-improvement 0.9600 Enforcing quantitative guardrails will prevent repeating past failures

Round 6 (5 假說)

狀態維度信心假說
pending 0.0000 VRP strategy variant: VRP_BASE
pending 0.0000 VRP strategy variant: VRP_SPREAD
pending 0.0000 VRP strategy variant: VRP_WEEKLY
pending 0.0000 VRP strategy variant: ALWAYS_SELL
pending 0.0000 VRP strategy variant: VRP_REGIME

Round 7 (1 假說)

狀態維度信心假說
pending 0.0000 VRP_REGIME strategy with Sharpe 3.00

錯誤日誌摘要

最近錯誤

方法評分

Agent方法成功率提出數確認數樣本數
risk-auditorstatistical-power0.00%101
risk-auditormultiple-testing0.00%101
risk-auditorregime-dependency0.00%101
risk-auditorfactor-attribution0.00%101
risk-auditorselection-bias0.00%101
risk-auditorbootstrap-validation0.00%101
risk-auditorgold-bias0.00%101
risk-auditorparameter-sensitivity0.00%101
risk-auditorstatistical-power-by-frequency0.00%101
risk-auditortestability-ranking0.00%101
risk-auditoroverfitting-risk0.00%101
risk-auditorfailure-analysis0.00%101
risk-auditorresearch-direction0.00%202
risk-auditorprocess-improvement0.00%101
optimizergeneral0.00%505
devilgeneral0.00%101

建議與後續行動