研究迴圈報告 — Run #20

研究主題:112 strategy for spy or spx or qqq, find the best setup and let me know the return. · 產生時間:2026-03-11 12:19:05 UTC

總輪次
5
總假說數
45
已確認
0
已拒絕
0
待驗證
45
最高信心
1.0000

執行摘要

本次研究迴圈共進行 5 輪, 產生 45 個假說, 其中 0 個通過驗證、 0 個被拒絕、 45 個待驗證。

總耗時 0 秒, 消耗 0 tokens。

各輪摘要

輪次Agent 數Agents假說數耗時Tokens
R13optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 15
R23optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 13
R33optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 5
R43optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 7
R53optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 5

輪次評分(Keep/Discard Gate)

輪次綜合分數SharpeDrawdown樣本量決策改善%
R1 0.2355 0.0000 0.5000 0.0000 KEEP
R2 0.2173 0.0000 0.5000 0.0000 KEEP -7.73%
R3 0.1437 0.0000 0.5000 0.0000 DISCARD -38.98%
R4 0.1906 0.0000 0.5000 0.0000 DISCARD -19.07%
R5 0.2355 0.0000 0.5000 0.0000 KEEP 0.00%

假說清單

Round 1 (15 假說)

狀態維度信心假說
pending data_quality_straddle 0.8500 ATM straddles are FEASIBLE for 0-7 DTE options at 9:31 open — 100% of ATM put-call pairs (where both have price > 0) also have BOTH legs with volume > 0
pending data_quality_calendar 0.7000 Calendar spreads are FEASIBLE — 659+ instances of same-strike, same-timestamp, 2+ liquid expirations found in just one month (Jan 2023)
pending data_quality_overall 0.9500 88.4% of ALL option bars at 9:31 near ATM have ZERO volume — the same data quality issue from prior runs persists across ALL strategy types
pending data_quality_0dte 0.9000 0DTE options have the BEST liquidity of any DTE bucket — 56-58% of ATM-range bars have volume > 0 vs ~12-16% for longer-dated
pending data_quality_covered_call 0.7500 Covered call (OTM call selling) has MARGINAL feasibility — only 12-16% of OTM call bars have volume at 9:31
pending execution_risk 0.9000 VWAP-close spread is a CRITICAL slippage risk — p95 divergence is 15%, median 0.55%
pending data_quality_tombstone 0.9900 16:00 tombstone bars are 96.5% zero-volume, 98.8% flat (H=L=C) — must be excluded from all analysis
pending data_quality_intraday 0.8500 Intraday volume follows U-shape — 9:31 (14.1%) and 15:59 (13.0%) are most liquid, midday (6.6-8.5%) least liquid
pending strategy_feasibility_negative 0.9500 STRATEGIES THAT WILL DEFINITELY FAIL: (1) Any strategy using underlying price from 'underlying' column — it contains 'SPX' string, not a price. (2) Gamma scalping — requires continuous delta hedging with sub-minute precision, impossible with 1-min OHLCV. (3) Iron condor with 30+ DTE — liquidity drop...
pending strategy_recommendation 0.8000 RECOMMENDED STRATEGY FAMILIES ranked by data feasibility: #1 0DTE ATM straddle/strangle (best liquidity), #2 1-3 DTE vertical spreads near ATM, #3 Calendar spreads 0-7 DTE, #4 Short-dated covered calls 0-3 DTE
pending 0.4500 Buying ATM straddles 1-2 days before known high-volatility events (FOMC, CPI, NFP) on 2-3 DTE options captures realized vol exceeding implied vol. Prior runs focused on SELLING premium; this tests BUYING premium when the vol risk premium inverts.
pending 0.3500 Buy 5-delta OTM options (calls for upside, puts for downside) when SPX breaks above/below the first 30-minute range, holding until 15:30 close. 0DTE options provide extreme leverage for intraday trend-following.
pending 0.4000 When short-term IV (0-2 DTE) exceeds long-term IV (14-21 DTE) by >2 vol points (inverted term structure), sell the short-dated ATM straddle and buy the longer-dated ATM straddle. Profit from term structure normalization as short IV mean-reverts faster.
pending 0.5000 Sell 5% OTM puts with 14 DTE systematically, but ONLY when VIX-implied 14-day move > 2× realized 14-day move (i.e., when VRP is wide). Skip entries when VRP is narrow. This filters for the highest-EV subset of put-selling.
pending 0.4000 After days when implied volatility spikes >20% (proxy: ATM straddle price jumps >20% day-over-day), sell ATM strangles with 7 DTE. Vol spikes are overwhelmingly mean-reverting — realized vol over the next 7 days is typically much lower than the spike-day IV implies.

Round 2 (13 假說)

狀態維度信心假說
pending 0.0000 0DTE ATM strangle selling (with stop loss): sell 1% OTM put + 1% OTM call at 9:35, exit at 15:45
pending 0.0000 0DTE ATM strangle selling (no stop loss): sell 1% OTM put + 1% OTM call at 9:35, exit at 15:45
pending data_quality 0.8500 Sharpe 5.59 is inflated due to zero-volume VWAP prices being treated as tradeable
pending execution_feasibility 0.8000 Average P&L of $2.17 per trade does not survive realistic slippage and transaction costs
pending theoretical_plausibility 0.9000 Intraday straddle sell captures minimal theta relative to gamma risk, making Sharpe 5.59 implausible for real trading
pending methodology 0.9500 No look-ahead bias detected in the script logic
pending variant_comparison 0.7500 Hold-to-expiry variant (Sharpe 1.66) is more realistic but still needs volume filtering
pending regime_sensitivity 0.7000 Strategy performance likely deteriorates significantly in high-volatility regimes
pending dte_optimization 0.7500 Selling 0DTE ATM straddles at 9:31 and closing at 15:00 captures intraday theta decay more efficiently than 7-DTE straddles, because 0DTE options have the highest theta decay rate (gamma/theta ratio peaks on expiration day) AND the best liquidity in our dataset (56-58% of ATM bars have volume vs ~12...
pending strike_selection 0.5500 Selling 7-DTE OTM strangles (call at ATM+25pts, put at ATM-25pts) instead of ATM straddles produces higher win rate (80%+) and lower max drawdown at the cost of lower total P&L, because the breakeven zone is wider. The Sharpe ratio may be comparable or better than straddle if the reduced frequency o...
pending exit_timing 0.6000 The optimal intraday exit time for 7-DTE straddle selling is NOT 15:00 but closer to 12:00-13:00, because theta decay is roughly linear intraday while gamma risk (adverse underlying moves) accumulates over time. Exiting earlier reduces exposure to afternoon volatility (which includes power hour 15:0...
pending data_integrity 0.8000 The Round 1 Sharpe of 5.59 is inflated because the backtest used VWAP prices from bars that may include zero-volume bars (the query filters vwap > 0 but does NOT filter volume > 0). Adding a strict volume > 0 filter on both legs will reduce the trade count and likely reduce Sharpe to 2.0-3.5, but th...
pending risk_management 0.6500 Adding a stop-loss at 1.5x-2.0x initial premium collected eliminates the fat left tail of the P&L distribution, improving the Sharpe ratio for the hold-to-expiry variant (currently Sharpe 1.66, max DD $1,323) while sacrificing minimal total P&L. The intraday variant (Sharpe 5.59) may not benefit fro...

Round 3 (5 假說)

狀態維度信心假說
pending entry_timing 0.7000 Delaying 0DTE strangle entry from 9:35 to 10:00 or 10:30 improves risk-adjusted returns because: (1) opening auction volatility creates adverse fills — bid-ask spreads are widest in the first 5-10 minutes, (2) volume ramps up after 9:45 providing better liquidity and more reliable VWAP prices, (3) t...
pending entry_timing 0.5500 0DTE strangle selling has a significant day-of-week effect: Monday entries produce higher Sharpe than Friday entries because (1) weekend theta decay is priced into Monday open but often over-estimated by the market, (2) Friday options face event risk from weekend news creating a 'reverse weekend eff...
pending entry_timing 0.5000 Entering 0DTE strangles on the day AFTER major volatility events (FOMC announcement, CPI release, NFP) produces higher risk-adjusted returns than typical days because: IV remains elevated from the prior day's shock but realized vol has already peaked and is declining (vol crush). This creates a temp...
pending entry_timing 0.7500 Restricting 0DTE strangle entries to days when BOTH legs have volume >= 100 contracts at entry time materially improves Sharpe ratio because: (1) higher volume implies tighter effective spreads, reducing implicit slippage, (2) volume > 100 acts as a proxy for institutional participation — these days...
pending entry_timing 0.6500 Selling 0DTE strangles ONLY when trailing 5-day realized volatility is below implied volatility (VRP > 0) improves Sharpe by 30-50% because: the volatility risk premium is time-varying and short premium strategies should only be deployed when VRP is positive (sellers are overcompensated). When reali...

Round 4 (7 假說)

狀態維度信心假說
pending 1.0000 0-DTE ATM_straddle strangle/straddle selling
pending 1.0000 0-DTE OTM_0.5pct strangle/straddle selling
pending 1.0000 0-DTE OTM_1pct strangle/straddle selling
pending 1.0000 0-DTE OTM_2pct strangle/straddle selling
pending 1.0000 0-DTE Asym_P2_C05 strangle/straddle selling
pending 1.0000 0-DTE IC_1pct_50pt strangle/straddle selling
pending 1.0000 0-DTE VolBased strangle/straddle selling

Round 5 (5 假說)

狀態維度信心假說
pending 0.0000 Closing the 0.5% OTM 0-DTE short strangle when unrealized profit reaches 50%, 75%, or 90% of initial credit received will improve risk-adjusted returns by reducing tail-risk exposure in the final hours when gamma is highest.
pending 0.0000 Exiting the 0.5% OTM strangle at a fixed time before market close — particularly around 13:00-14:00 ET — will produce a superior Sharpe ratio by eliminating the high-gamma final hours while capturing the bulk of morning theta decay.
pending 0.0000 Implementing a trailing stop that exits when unrealized P&L drops by 30% / 50% / 75% from its intraday peak will protect gains from sudden reversals while allowing winning trades to run, producing better risk-adjusted returns than a fixed profit target.
pending 0.0000 When the underlying breaches one strike of the strangle (making that leg deep ITM), closing ONLY the losing leg while holding the winning leg to expiry will reduce max drawdown significantly compared to holding both legs, because the winning leg's remaining theta offsets some of the loss.
pending 0.0000 Exiting the entire strangle when the SPX moves more than 0.3% / 0.5% / 0.75% from entry level will act as a hard stop-loss that caps catastrophic losses on trending days, at the cost of some whipsaw exits on mean-reverting days.

負面結果(已排除的方向)

輪次維度方法失敗原因分數
R3 expiration_choice Delaying 0DTE strangle entry from 9:35 to 10:00 or 10:30 improves risk-adjusted returns because: (1) opening auction volatility creates adverse fills — bid-ask spreads are widest in the first 5-10 min... Composite score 0.1437 below baseline 0.1437
R4 position_sizing 0-DTE ATM_straddle strangle/straddle selling; 0-DTE OTM_0.5pct strangle/straddle selling; 0-DTE OTM_1pct strangle/straddle selling Composite score 0.1906 below baseline 0.1906

方法評分

Agent方法成功率提出數確認數樣本數
risk-auditordata_quality_straddle0.00%101
researcherexit_timing0.00%101
risk-auditordata_quality_overall0.00%101
risk-auditordata_quality_0dte0.00%101
risk-auditordata_quality_covered_call0.00%101
risk-auditorexecution_risk0.00%101
risk-auditordata_quality_tombstone0.00%101
risk-auditordata_quality_calendar0.00%101
risk-auditorstrategy_feasibility_negative0.00%101
risk-auditorstrategy_recommendation0.00%101
researchergeneral0.00%505
optimizergeneral0.00%202
risk-auditordata_quality0.00%101
risk-auditorexecution_feasibility0.00%101
risk-auditortheoretical_plausibility0.00%101
risk-auditormethodology0.00%101
risk-auditorvariant_comparison0.00%101
risk-auditorregime_sensitivity0.00%101
researcherdte_optimization0.00%101
researcherstrike_selection0.00%101
researchergeneral0.00%505
researcherdata_integrity0.00%101
researcherrisk_management0.00%101
researcherentry_timing0.00%505
researchergeneral0.00%707
risk-auditordata_quality_intraday0.00%101

建議與後續行動