研究迴圈報告 — Run #21

研究主題:validate 0DTE strangle profit target · 產生時間:2026-03-11 13:36:58 UTC

總輪次
8
總假說數
23
已確認
0
已拒絕
0
待驗證
23
最高信心
1.0000

執行摘要

本次研究迴圈共進行 8 輪, 產生 23 個假說, 其中 0 個通過驗證、 0 個被拒絕、 23 個待驗證。

總耗時 0 秒, 消耗 0 tokens。

各輪摘要

輪次Agent 數Agents假說數耗時Tokens
R14data-quality-check, optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 5
R23optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 6
R33optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 12
R43optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 0
R54optimizer, position_sizing_raw, researcher, risk-auditor 0
R63optimizer, researcher, risk-auditor 0
R72devil, risk-auditor 0
R82devil, risk-auditor 0

輪次評分(Keep/Discard Gate)

輪次綜合分數SharpeDrawdown樣本量決策改善%
R1 0.2750 0.0000 0.5000 0.0000 KEEP
R2 0.2656 0.0000 0.5000 0.0000 KEEP -3.42%
R3 0.2221 0.0000 0.5000 0.0000 DISCARD -19.24%
R4 0.2188 0.0000 0.5000 0.0000 DISCARD -20.44%
R5 0.2228 0.0000 0.5000 0.0000 DISCARD -18.98%
R6 0.2188 0.0000 0.5000 0.0000 DISCARD -20.44%
R7 0.1250 0.0000 0.5000 0.0000 DISCARD -54.55%
R8 0.1893 0.0000 0.5000 0.0000 DISCARD -31.16%

假說清單

Round 1 (5 假說)

狀態維度信心假說
pending validate 0DTE strangle profit target 0.9200 H1: 25% profit target maximizes risk-adjusted returns for 0DTE short strangles
pending validate 0DTE strangle profit target 0.9000 H2: Combining 25% profit target with 1.5x credit stop-loss yields optimal Sharpe for 0DTE strangles
pending validate 0DTE strangle profit target 0.8000 H3: Profit targets should NOT be dynamically scaled by implied volatility for 0DTE strangles
pending validate 0DTE strangle profit target 0.8800 H4: 0DTE strangle profit targets are hit predominantly in the first 90 minutes, enabling morning-only trading
pending validate 0DTE strangle profit target 0.9300 H5: Higher profit targets increase average P&L but degrade risk-adjusted returns due to tail risk exposure

Round 2 (6 假說)

狀態維度信心假說
pending entry_timing 0.0000 0DTE short strangle entry timing sweep: test 7 entry times (09:31 through 13:00) with 1% OTM strikes and 50% profit target
pending entry_timing 0.9100 H1: 09:31 market-open entry dominates all later entry times for 0DTE short strangles on risk-adjusted returns
pending entry_timing 0.8900 H2: A minimum credit filter ($3.50) dramatically improves 09:31 entry Sharpe from 0.22 to 0.34 by eliminating unprofitable low-vol days
pending entry_timing 0.8800 H3: Delaying entry to 10:00 to let opening volatility settle does NOT improve returns — it destroys the premium advantage
pending entry_timing 0.9300 H4: The 25% PT is typically hit within 31 minutes of 09:31 entry, making this a morning-only rapid-fire strategy
pending entry_timing 0.8700 H5: The optimal combined strategy is 09:31 entry + credit>=$3.50 filter + 25% PT + 1.5x SL, achieving Sharpe 0.34 with 93.5% win rate

Round 3 (12 假說)

狀態維度信心假說
pending 1.0000 0-DTE ATM_straddle strangle with 50% PT, $1 slippage
pending 1.0000 0-DTE OTM_0.5pct strangle with 50% PT, $1 slippage
pending 1.0000 0-DTE OTM_1.0pct strangle with 50% PT, $1 slippage
pending 1.0000 0-DTE OTM_1.5pct strangle with 50% PT, $1 slippage
pending 1.0000 0-DTE OTM_2.0pct strangle with 50% PT, $1 slippage
pending 0.0000 0-DTE OTM_3.0pct strangle with 50% PT, $1 slippage
pending 1.0000 0-DTE Asym_P2_C05 strangle with 50% PT, $1 slippage
pending strike_selection 0.0000 H1: Fixed-dollar OTM strike widths ($20/$30/$50) outperform percentage-based (0.5%/1%/2%) for 0DTE strangles because SPX intraday moves are more absolute-dollar-bounded than percentage-bounded
pending strike_selection 0.0000 H2: Asymmetric strike placement (put 1.5% OTM, call 0.7% OTM) outperforms symmetric 1% OTM because SPX has persistent negative skew — downside vol is overpriced relative to upside
pending strike_selection 0.0000 H3: Wide strangle (2% OTM) with NO profit target outperforms narrow strangle (0.5% OTM) WITH 50% profit target on risk-adjusted basis because the narrow strangle's tail risk from breaches exceeds the benefit of early exits
pending strike_selection 0.0000 H4: Strike width should adapt to VIX level — use 0.7% OTM when VIX<20, 1.5% when VIX 20-30, 2.5% when VIX>30 — outperforming any fixed-width strangle
pending strike_selection 0.0000 H5: Iron condor (buying wings $20 further OTM) at same short strikes as naked strangle reduces max loss enough to improve risk-adjusted returns despite lower net credit

負面結果(已排除的方向)

輪次維度方法失敗原因分數
R3 expiration_choice 0-DTE ATM_straddle strangle with 50% PT, $1 slippage; 0-DTE OTM_0.5pct strangle with 50% PT, $1 slippage; 0-DTE OTM_1.0pct strangle with 50% PT, $1 slippage Composite score 0.2221 below baseline 0.2221
R4 position_sizing Round 4 research on position_sizing Composite score 0.2188 below baseline 0.2188
R5 exit_rules Round 5 research on exit_rules Composite score 0.2228 below baseline 0.2228
R6 regime_filter Round 6 research on regime_filter Composite score 0.2188 below baseline 0.2188
R7 volatility_surface Round 7 research on volatility_surface Composite score 0.1250 below baseline 0.1250
R8 correlation Round 8 research on correlation Composite score 0.1893 below baseline 0.1893

錯誤日誌摘要

最近錯誤

方法評分

Agent方法成功率提出數確認數樣本數
researchervalidate 0DTE strangle profit target0.00%505
optimizerentry_timing0.00%101
researcherentry_timing0.00%505
optimizergeneral0.00%707
researcherstrike_selection0.00%505

建議與後續行動